Hey everyone. I got some time to do the latest update to the board software, but it meant that all the old modifications and styles wouldn't work anymore. So, here you have the newest iteration of LabourTalk. Please let me know by Private Message if you run into any issues with the new styling. Some new features on the board are:

  • Latest HTML5 Responsive Styling - You can now see a new, more modern styling on the board. Along with this, you can resize the browser to see the board change with it. The board is now functional on all sizes of screens, including your cell phone, table and desktop/laptop.
  • Post Sharing - Although you could previously, the new layout means the sharing icons are more visible on the lower right hand corner of each post. Click your favourite social media outlet to share the desired post with them.
  • Multiple Themes - Previously there was only one theme in an attempt to lower the workload when modifications were put in place. Fortunately, the new modification system is much simpler to implement and we now have multiple colour options for you to enjoy. You can change these from your User Control Panel under the Board Settings heading.
  • Announcements - Announcements can now be posted here (where you're seeing this one) and, in most cases, can be dismissed. To dismiss them, please click the "X" in the top right corner of this box.
  • Collapsing Categories - Categories, such as News & Announcements or Welcome (below), can be collapsed to clear up some of the clutter. This state should be maintained as long as you're logged in.

We hope you like the changes!

BC - Can I be fired for trying to decertify?

For posting of generic news and event surrounding Labour Issues in Canada
User avatar
NC
Site Administrator
Site Administrator
Posts: 3139
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2005 3:43 pm
Location: Vancouver

BC - Can I be fired for trying to decertify?

Postby NC » Fri May 27, 2011 12:13 pm

An email I received...

To those not clear, BC allows the draconian labour law that if you become a member in bad standing you *can* be fired from your job if the union asks it, and there is a "security clause" in the Collective Agreement.
I was asked a question about whether one could be fired for running a decert in BC.

I have yet to read a CA that does *not* have a security clause, even in the Federal sector, where you expressly *cannot* be fired for being a member in bad standing.

The question poses a dichotomy, because the BC Code states pretty directly (I think) that one cannot be fired for making an application under the Code, or for… here:
[Section 5] Prohibition against dismissals, etc., for exercising employee rights
5 (1) A person must not
(a) refuse to employ or refuse to continue to employ a person,
(b) threaten dismissal of or otherwise threaten a person,
(c) discriminate against or threaten to discriminate against a person with respect to employment or a term or condition of employment or membership in a trade union, or
(d) intimidate or coerce or impose a pecuniary or other penalty on a person, because of a belief that the person may testify in a proceeding under this Code or because the person has made or is about to make a disclosure that may be required of the person in a proceeding under this Code or because the person has made an application, filed a complaint or otherwise exercised a right conferred by or under this Code or because the person has participated or is about to participate in a proceeding under this Code.
The dichotomy arises when applied to some union Constitutions that state pretty emphatically that one is “in bad standingâ€


Find - Desiderata - read it

JJ
Rookie Poster
Rookie Poster
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:45 pm
Location: Oshawa, ON

Postby JJ » Sat May 28, 2011 2:22 pm

I sent three decisions to your email, i can't post to the site so you will have to. they are bc decisions that support the idea that employees are protected from their unions when participating in board proceedings, or making applications pursuant to the labour code.

B302 - (1998) is directly related to a decert vote.
C217 - (1989) is directly related to a decert vote.
B8 - (1988) is related to a vote that the unions forbid employees to take part in.

The board finds against the union in all these cases. in particular in the first two both unions try to persue the employees for trying to decertify and both lose.

*** NC added the Links to JJ's post ***




Return to “National - Canadian Labour Issues”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest